阿郎的故事

剧情片香港1989

主演:周润发,张艾嘉,黄坤玄,吴孟达,王天林

导演:杜琪峰

 剧照

阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.1阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.2阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.3阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.4阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.5阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.6阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.13阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.14阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.15阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.16阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.17阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.18阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.19阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.20
更新时间:2024-06-29 04:03

详细剧情

  阿郎(周润发 饰)年轻时作为出色的赛车手很是放荡不羁,却不妨碍富家女波波(张艾嘉 饰)对其一往情深。波波不顾家人反对,同他结婚并怀下身孕后,发现阿郎背着她还有其它女人,于是愤然离去。波波临盆之际,阿郎参加非法赛车撞死警察入狱。波波被母亲和医生欺骗婴儿夭折,后去了美国生活。出狱后,阿郎为以前行为愧疚,从孤儿院找回儿子取名“波仔”(黄坤玄 饰)。父子二人开始相依为命过日子。  十年后,已有未婚夫的波波回港又遇阿郎,得知波仔是自己的儿子后,想将其带去美国。内心仍深爱波波的阿郎为了证明自己已有彻底改变,决定不顾年纪和身体状况再战赛场。

 长篇影评

 1 ) 男人的样板

当鲜血满面的阿郎驾着赛车风驰电掣冲过终点之后摇摇晃晃摔倒在地的时候
当波仔和波波从一脸的喜悦瞬间转为满脸泪水继而疯狂奔入赛车跑道的时候
当阿郎的脸在赛车爆炸的火光中若隐若现的时候
当罗大佑的"你的样子"再一次在耳边响起的时候
俺起身关了正在努力制冷的空调
尽管室外温度超过35摄氏度
因为
突然俺感到冷极了
这是一种彻底的深入骨髓的寒冷
一种无可名状的悲哀迅速地在体内扩散
......

"人真的不能做错事,做错了一辈子都翻不了身"
"Man should never do thing wrong.Once you do ,game over."
阿郎一脸悔恨在说这句话时
一定不曾想到
有些错事将会用自己的性命来改正
却原来英语台词早已有了提示----Game over!

十年前
波波顶住家庭的压力与阿郎一起生活
可有一天
阿郎亲手打走了已有身孕的波波
波波生下波仔后就远渡重洋
整整十年
阿郎单身一人带着波仔打拼生活
影片讲述的就是十年后阿郎波仔再次遇见波波的情感故事

阿郎一直就不是个好男人
直到当波波提出带波仔去美国的时候
阿郎受到了严峻的考验
有些男人非到关键是看不出其责任心
阿郎就是
处于社会底层的阿郎曾是小混混的阿郎经常在街头飙车的阿郎进过监狱的阿郎
除了身边可爱的波仔
这一辈子真的什么都没有
波仔是他最宝贵的财产
很难想象就是这么个男人
会同意让波波带走波仔
并且在波仔不愿意离开他的时候
狠狠的揍了波仔一顿
硬是把波仔推到波波的身边
......

当波仔哭着闹着寻找老爸最终在赛场上扑到老爸怀里的时候
当阿郎为了波仔的生活重出江湖再次跨上赛车准备赢取这次比赛的时候
当波波明白了什么是十年的父子感情明白谁又深深爱着她决定留下来陪伴阿郎和波仔的时候
....
当一切随人心愿万事如意顺利发展的时候
悲剧发生了
在撞击声爆炸声喊声哭声和一片火光漫天硝烟中
依旧自信乐观阿郎的生命却随着"你的样子"渐渐消逝

我听到传来的谁的声音象那梦里呜咽中的小河
我看到远去的谁的步伐遮住告别时哀伤的眼神
......


若按五星评定法
此片在俺心中是五星
决无疑问

 2 ) Sean Gilman: All About Ah-Long

//theendofcinema.net/2016/02/01/running-out-of-karma-all-about-ah-long/

Chow’s fate is determined as much by chance as by any action of his own. There’s always a sense of randomness in To’s tragedies, a kind of contingency that denies any simple moral reading.

After an auspicious, if commercially unsuccessful, debut with the New Wave wuxiaThe Enigmatic Case in 1980, To spent the early 80s working in Hong Kong television. In 1986 he returned to film working under Raymond Wong Bak-ming at the Cinema City studio, he he made the popular, if not especially distinguished comediesHappy Ghost 3 andSeven Years Itch. These were followed in 1988 by a pair of films, the smash hit farceThe Eighth Happiness and the contemporary crime pictureThe Big Heat. He followed that up in 1989 withAll About Ah-Long,a domestic melodrama that becamethe number one film of the year at the Hong Kong box office, the second year in a row a To film had accomplished that feat.The film reunited To withEighth Happiness star Chow Yun-fat andSeven Years Itchstar Sylvia Chang. Like all of To’s previous four films it was produced by Raymond Wong for Cinema City, but it is a much more dramatically ambitious work. Cinema City at their best was a freewheeling, anarchic studio where anything was possible. The loose atmosphere was responsible for some of the greatest films of the decade (in Hong Kong or otherwise), but also a whole lot of just bizarrely silly nonsense (the Yuen-Woo-ping directedMismatched Couples, for example, in which Yuen tried to make Donnie Yen a star with a breakdancing comedy).The Eighth Happinessexemplified the lunatic side of the studio, an improvisational, tasteless and often hilarious comedy that helped establish the template for a certain type of all-star Lunar New Year comedy (a tradition that continues to this day).

All About Ah-Long, though, is a real movie. Written by stars Chow and Chang (an unusual credit for Chow (his only other story credit is on the 1995 Wai Ka-fai film Peace Hotel), while Chang had already begun the move from movie and pop star to accomplished writer/director), it takes Oscar winnerKramer vs. Kramer as a starting point. Chow plays a construction worker raising his ten year old son, Porky. A former motorcycle racer and drunk, Chow is loud and crude but cares deeply for his kid. When his friend Ng Man-tat (in one of his early dramatic roles, before he became Stephen Chow’s favorite comic foil) gets Porky an audition for a kids’ fashion commercial, they discover that the commercial’s director is Chang, the boy’s mother, returned from America for the first time in a decade. Brief flashbacks fill out the story (Chow was philanderingand abusive and ended up briefly in jail after a motorcycle accident; Chang’s mother hated him and told Chang her son had died after she moved with her to the US), while Chang tries to build a relationship with her son and Chow tries to rekindle his romance with Chang.

It’s an against-type performance from Chow, as arguably the coolest man in cinema in the late-80s dresses down with patched-together clothes and a hideous mop of hair. He’s a deeply flawed man who is completely aware of his faults. Chang is the class opposite: intelligent and reserved, she is the wealth of America, trying to win Porky’s affection with all the things and opportunities she can muster. This is one of the things that distinguishesAh-Long from its American progenitor: whileKramer vs. Kramer paints a complicated picture of 1970s feminism (the breakdown of the home as the wife seeks a life in the workforce),Ah-Longis moreof a class allegory. There’s no expectation that Chang should abandoned her career to be Chow’s housewife, such a thing is unthinkable. However there’s a deep undercurrent of unease with Chang’s cosmopolitan wealth. Both parents want Porky to have all the advantages wealth can confer (education, nutrition, culture, adventure), but there’s an inauthenticity to her world. The film opens with shots of Hong Kong streets, notably not the skyscrapers and businessmen and other conspicuous symbols of the capitalist paradise that was the colony in the late 1980s, but rather of narrow, crowded alleys, packed with shops and debris. It isn’t the gangland slum of the Kowloon Walled City that Johnnie To grew up in, instead it’s a less hyperbolic, more imaginable kind of everyday poverty. Throughout, To will contrast realist images of working class Hong Kong with the glossier sheen of its upper class, mixing aclass-conscious New Wave aesthetic with the pop song montages ofcommercial cinema. When Porky first visits his mother in her hotel (the “Oriental”) he gazes in wonder at the shiny white surfaces, and especially the glass elevator rising infinitely upward at the lobby’s core. Elevators will become a recurring image and location throughout To’s career, a symbol of fear, of entrapment, of the unknown. The image is built upon in a later section ofAh-Long, when Porky and Chang goes to an amusement park and she can’t handle the vertiginous ups and downs of the rides. Porky loves it of course, ping-ponging between highs and lows, but Chang needs to stay on one level: she can’t go back down.

In many ways, Johnnie To’s most recent film is a kind of spiritual sequel toAll About Ah-Long. Reunited with Chow and Chang for the first time in over 20 years, and adapting a play written by Chang,Office is about a pair of young office workers who learn that life at the top of the corporate elevator is more corrupt than they could imagine. Chow and Chang play the oldest couple, the company’s CEO and Owner, long engaged in an amoral struggle for power over each other. A middle couple forms the heart of the film, played by Tang Wei and Eason Chan: Chan is already corrupted, Tang is on her way there. The two share a duet (the film is a musical, with songs by Lo Ta-yu, who also did the music forAll About Ah-Long) where they sing of their hometowns, paradises where there was no ambition. All the corruption of the corporate world is the result of aspiration, of the drive to rise up, to bend and break the rules of conscience in the name of things. Chan is haunted by a recurring nightmare of an elevator: not of falling down an empty shaft, but pointedly being crushed on the ground floor. Porky inAh-Long watches with hope as an elevator rises, Chan cowers in fear as one falls.

I can’t write aboutAll About Ah-Long without addressing it’s ending, so here’s where you can check out if you haven’t seen the film and care about spoilers. Unless I can track down a copy of his two-part TV movieThe Iron Butterfly, the next film in the series with be a New Years comedy reunion with Chow and Chang,The Fun, The Luck and the Tycoon, to be followed by To’s first collaboration with screenwriter Wai-Ka-fai,TheStory of My Son.

Like many a Hong Kong film,All About Ah-Long has a doubleending. David Bordwell writes about the end of the 1987 Chow Yun-fat melodramaAn Autumn’s Tale (directed by Mabel Cheung), where the romantic couple separates at the end, with Chow’s deadbeat failing to win the more upwardly-mobile woman. This is followed by a brief epilogue, set sometime in the future, where the lovers meet again with Chow having miraculously cleaned up his act and become a financial success. Bordwell notes that the multiple, tonally opposite endings work to give the audience a range of ways to react to the film: they get both the happy and tragic endings and therefore a more total experience of melodrama.All About Ah-Long takes the experience to another, emotionally pummeling, level. After a long decline into sadness, where Porky leaves with Chang (with Chow delivering a heart-breakingHarry and the Hendersonsdriving-the-boy-away scene),and then changes his mind and returns to his dad. Chow then decides to race again and gets a haircut and a motorcycle. Father and son head to the Macao Grand Prix, where Chang shows up just as the race is about to start: the family at last will be reunited, with a newly cleaned-up Chow finally worthy of being a husband and father. He races, he’s about to win, and then he crashes. But he gets back on his bike (because that’s what we do), despitea significant head injury (a chance blow from another motorcycle). Summoning all his strength, with intercut shots of his wildly supportivefamily, Chow comes back and wins the race. Porky and Chang leap with joy as Chow, in excruciating slow motion, loses control of his bike and crashes into a wall. He watches his family rush toward him as the motorcycle explodes and he is engulfed in flames. The credits roll over documentary-style slo-mo footage of the wreckage, the horror in the crowd, the anguished faces of mother and son. It’s an astonishing, flabbergasting ending. Such a finale would be unthinkable in a Hollywood movie (can you imagine a film with equivalent-level stars, say Leonardo DiCaprio and Charlize Theron, where the family is just about to get back together but instead Leo dies right at the end? There would be riots in the streets.)

This ending is vital for To’s idea of the film, the sharp, unexpected swerve into tragedy is something he’ll return to again and again in his career. In his interview with Stephen Teo, he says thatAll About Ah-Long was “the first film in which I could line everything up in one go; as the film that was made really from my own thoughts. I am grateful to Chow Yun-fat, who gave me many of his own insights, and also to Sylvia Chang, who actually wrote the treatment and was involved in the production, She disagreed with my ending but I told her I was making the film because of the ending. It may be flawed but I insisted upon it.” The ending is crushing not so much because of its shockingness, although that is certainly a factor, but also because the happier ending that preceded it made so much sense: everything about the surface of the film tells us that this is the kind of movie that will end happily, the two beautiful stars will get back together and their family will be whole. But the ending brings out the darkness, the fear and paranoia that underlies so many of the preceding images, the class contrasts, the vertiginous heights and grimy lows of pre-Handover Hong Kong.The Big Heat too is motivated by an apocalyptic fear of the Handover, as Britain and China agreed that the colony would be handed back to the Mainland, the child’s fate determined by the whims of its parent nations. This strain of paranoia is so present in the Hong Kong cinema of the period that it’s become a critical cliche to remark upon it, like the Cold War dread of 1950s American sci-fi films. Butthere’s an even deeper,more universal fearinAll About Ah-Long, where the paranoia is motivated by diaspora, the promise of wonder in life outside China, but is rooted in a more basic class anxiety: the fear that moving up means becoming inauthentic.

For To and Chow, who grew up relatively impoverished and were now at the pinnacle of their professions, that must have been a very real concern. Chang had a different childhood, born in Taiwan she also spent time in Hong Kong and New York growing up, before dropping out of school to pursue singing and acting at age 16. The film is thus a recreation of the real-life dynamics between the two male auteurs and the female one. It has been pointed out that contrary to expectations in this melodrama the male character is far more emotionally expressive than the female one, with Chow giving a loud, dynamic performance where Chang is cool and internalized (there is a lifelong relationship in a nutshell in a simple eyeroll Chang gives as she sits on the back of Chow’s moped). This is less agender matter though than a class one I think: Chow’s manners are boorish where Chang is refined. The tension between the three artists is vital to the push-pull nature of the melodrama: neither parent is demonized or lionized as the film goes on, both characters are warm and loving to their son, both are full of regrets for their actions a decade earlier (though Chow has more to regret), both want to be forgiving to each other, both know that that is impossible. But ultimately it’s To’s vision that wins out, and it’s a deeply pessimistic one: Ah-Long, a poor but happy man for the first time in his life aspiring to greatness, seeing his dream within reach and then literally exploding. It isn’t a tragic ending, in the sense that it is totally unpredictable: Chow’s fate is determined as much by chance as by any action of his own. There’s always a sense of randomness in To’s tragedies, a kind of contingency that denies any simplemoral reading. Just as inOffice,aspiration ultimately leads to self-destruction, but that destruction can manifest itself in wildly unexpected ways. This black strain, the doom of a universe governed by fate that operates through chance, will surface again and again through To’s career, mixed as it is with farces and romances and stories of brotherhood, moments of liberation and freedom and darkest despair.All About Ah-Long, his first truly great film,is the first to fully express this multiplicity of moods.

 3 ) 生活安稳就是福

女人要的是安稳,男人却永远晚一步知道 男人和女人及时年龄相当,对待事物也永远存在着差距,女人的心智总是比男人成熟些,当男人拼命耍帅甚至不顾惜自己的身体时,自以为这样可以博得女人的关注,而实际上她只是希望你可以健康平安,不需要酷炫和激情!

不知道为什么看了这部电影最大的感触竟是这些,就像阿郎和波波,当波波已经怀有身孕时,她已经以一个为人母为人妻的角度对待阿郎,对待生活,然而,已经为人父的阿郎却还是那个放荡不羁不肯安稳下来的愣头小子!所以,他得到了教训,而她失去了生活的重心,伤心不已!而多年后再次相遇时,我实在不理解阿郎为什么要通过比赛来证明自己?难道最应该证明的不是如何去做一个合格的丈夫和父亲吗?那些危险极速的挑战真的是女人想要的吗?

虽然对电影的情节有分歧,但周润发的阿郎是我印象中最深刻的一个角色,一直觉得像大哥的小马哥也可以去饰演一个有笑有泪的普通人,前后的反差也诠释的让人跟着心酸,却不失温情!

 4 ) 我听到远处传来你的声音

   “我听到传来的谁的声音,像那梦里呜咽中的小河。”一首被唱烂了的歌,一首煽情到极致的歌,电影结束,有多少人仍不愿离场,有多少人仍呆在屏幕前,发呆抑或是等待,等待阿郎的复活,还是在等待什么呢?
    很早就知道这部电影,却一直没有看,或许知道是经典,或许似乎都可以猜出很多的情节,或许什么都不是,不是那么多的电影都会看的,总有些会错过,今夜,初秋的NJ夜色很好,今天是满月了吧,再拾起这部电影的时候,我没有免俗地和许多人一样被感动.
    那是1989年的香港,一个男人带着自己的孩子,在清晨,忙碌杂乱地收拾东西上班,上课.
    那是1989年的香港,工地上尘土飞扬,他有没有想念那个他年少轻狂伤害过的女子.
    那是1989年的香港,一个平凡的不能再平凡的故事,年幼无知的少女,年少轻狂的浪子,年轻时不懂事的伤害,再加上一个叫波仔的小孩,却哭掉了无数的男男女女,很多人都知道这个结局,在我没看电影的时候,我看见阿郎骑上摩托车我就知道他一定会挂,只是看后才了然,还是那样的悲壮,忍不住骂杜琪锋,明明都可以大团圆,最后还是要安排阿郎死,他明明可以看见这一生他最爱的两个人向他跑来,而他却只能闭上双眼,然后离的那么远,很煽情的结尾,很俗套的故事,可是我们依然流泪,依然感动,是为了这结局,还是为了那些莫名其妙的坚持和梦想,这是一个以理想和坚持为耻的时代,或许那些一个人带着孩子生活得并不那么惬意的人们更能体会那个工地上干活的男人,那个带走孩子他就一无所有的男人,那个为了比赛丢掉自己生命的男人.无论是哪里触动了你的神经,你心底最柔软的地方都被触碰.又或许仅仅只是青春的躁动,命运的不安.
    "强极则辱,情深不寿,谦谦君子,温润如玉",而罗大佑只是在唱"我听到传来的谁的声音,象那梦里呜咽中的小河,我看到远去的谁的步伐,遮住告别时哀伤的眼神".我看见阿郎在十年后的中环夜色里载着波波在时光的轨道里穿梭,那些年少轻狂的日子,那些简单明亮的快乐,我看见波仔拿着阿郎买的一枝玫瑰花,送给他们都爱的女人的时候,说的那句“生日快乐,真土”那样像极了他的老爸,我看见波波那样温柔地颔首,把自己埋在花中。每一个人看电影,更多的都是在这样的光和影里想着自己的故事,是谁说我们以为拥有的是未来,其实留下的只有记忆。
    或许明日太阳西下倦鸟已归时,你将已经踏上旧时的归途。倦鸟已归,可是归途早已是不归路,有人说这是一部属于70年代生人的电影,我不知道,现在早已开始提到90年代,不是我们不明白,是社会变化太快。那是1989年,搁到明年就已20年的光阴,那个时候打打闹闹,抱着阿郎的腿不放,哭着闹着“老爸,你不要离开”的波仔都已接近三十,可这又有什么关系呢?还是有那么多人,依然热爱,依然激情,依然渴望所有的幸福和爱。


     

 5 ) 你的样子

那看似满不在乎转过身的
是风干泪眼后萧瑟的影子
不明白的是为何人世间
总不能溶解你的样子
是否来迟了明白的渊源
早谢了你的笑容我的心情
不变的你
伫立在茫茫的尘世中
聪明的孩子
提着易碎的灯笼
潇洒的你
将心事化尽尘缘中
孤独的孩子
你是造物的恩宠
不变的你
伫立在茫茫的尘世中
聪明的孩子
提着心爱的灯笼
潇洒的你
将心事化尽尘缘中
孤独的孩子
你是造物的恩宠
 
    影片在罗大佑《你的样子》歌曲中结束,原以为结尾会是破镜重圆一家三口团聚,没想到是悲剧结局,杜琪峰不仅有枪战警匪片,还有如此煽情亲情爱情片,让人流泪,感动。
     十年前,年少无知的波波顶住家里反对和年少轻狂放浪不羁的阿郎在一起,确在自己怀孕期间,阿郎出轨,又被阿郎打走。年轻的阿郎真是渣男一枚。波波以为孩子夭折远渡重洋。阿郎出狱后一个人抚养波仔。
     十年后,也就是影片讲的波波回到香港,知道波仔是儿子后,和波仔这段时间的相处和给予波仔物质上的帮助,但与阿郎再也回不去了。在波波想带波仔回美国,再好的物质也抵不过这十年来相依为命的父子情。
      当阿郎再次踏上比较战场,当波波决定回归 我想大多数人看到这会猜到结尾是阿郎赢得比赛第一名 波仔有了圆满完整的家庭。可是比赛中途发生意外,如果阿郎中途放弃会是另一种结果,浪子终究是浪子 选择了继续前行冲向终点,哪怕头破血流,哪怕粉身碎骨。
      阿郎的扮演者周润发 在影片里前期头型很挫,但最后比赛时 帅气的发型 有型的赛服 帅呆了。
      张艾嘉年轻时真是大写的美, 现在也很有气质 (可以看看去年和杜琪峰,周润发再次合作的《华丽上班族》气质干练)。
      波仔 小演员 演的真好 可以说影片里演的最好的。
       影片 拍摄于80年代,可以看出当时的香港很繁华,高级饭店,游乐场。张艾嘉的发型也是时代的流行标志。

 6 ) 轻飘飘的旧时光-第一次看《阿郎的故事》

    白天在超市淘了片《阿郎的故事》,晚上回来给看掉了,狂哭,真是太好看了。
  很老很老的片子了,属于那种我应该早看过却一直没看的电影。周润发和张艾嘉,再加上一个叫波仔的小孩,平凡的不能再平凡的故事,却哭掉了一个十年又一个十年的大好青年。电影也好歌曲也好,基本上你的人生里总会遇到几个毫不相干的人跟你说起《你的样子》时一脸意难平。而我猜这泪奔的大军里大概是毕业的比大学生多,男生比女生多。每个人的液化点不一样,但大抵上我觉得看这部片子会哭的人应该是那种已不太年轻却还未来得及苍老的,是那种拥有过又知道自己做错了最终失去的。再加上有个特别皮却又特别有情有义的小孩(笑),他只要老爸老爸老爸的这么一叫,我就狂想哭。汗。原来小孩和动物真的是催泪的不二法则。叹。
  
  看到后来阿郎要去赛车我就知道他一定会挂,看金刚的时候知道猩猩要挂的时候我没有太多感觉,但到了这个可以说生活的很失败的除了儿子什么都没有的男人要挂的时候,我却体会到了那种很想很想关遥控器的心情,虐啊。尤其是看到他满脸是血的冲向终点,心里明明在骂这结局这情节真tm狗血,眼泪却不停的大滴大滴往下掉。那时候感觉真悲壮,不光是为了周润发,而是我们这些还在坚持,为了些莫名其妙的所谓理想,明知不可为而为之的心境。一个在工地干活的男人为了一场赛车丢掉性命这种事情不具有代表性,可是那么多没有骑过摩托没有带过孩子的人看到它却都会被触动,触动心底的那根神经。那里不是特别苍凉那里不是特别孤独那里也不是特别柔软,只是,当你和青春和躁动和命运和生活和解了之后,那里有东西一息尚存。
  
  大部分人都会在结尾《你的样子》中哭的唏哩哗啦,之前没看这部电影的时候,我就很爱罗大佑和这首歌。我知道,和我一样的人有很多很多,黄小邪说乾隆给陈家洛写的“强极则辱,情深不寿,谦谦君子,温润如玉”的对立面就是《你的样子》。年前上新东方的考研英语,写作老师是个很滑头的道士,有一次他突然说起有一年暑假他们几个老师在一个体育馆里通宵喝啤酒打麻将的往事,那时候他们唱一首歌唱了整个晚上,就是《你的样子》。我想他们当时一定哭了。
  我听到传来的谁的声音
  象那梦里呜咽中的小河
  我看到远去的谁的步伐
  遮住告别时哀伤的眼神
  不明白的是你为何情愿
  让风尘刻划你的样子
  就象早已忘情的世界
  曾经拥有你的名字我的声音
  那悲歌总会在梦中惊醒
  诉说一点哀伤过的往事
  那看似满不在乎转过身的
  是风干泪眼后萧瑟的影子
  不明白的是为何人世间
  总不能溶解你的样子
  是否来迟了明白的渊源
  早谢了你的笑容我的心情
  不变的你
  伫立在茫茫的尘世中
  聪明的孩子
  提着易碎的灯笼
  潇洒的你
  将心事化尽尘缘中
  孤独的孩子
  你是造物的恩宠
  不变的你
  伫立在茫茫的尘世中
  聪明的孩子
  提着心爱的灯笼
  潇洒的你
  将心事化尽尘缘中
  孤独的孩子
  你是造物的恩宠
  电影里头,张艾嘉抱着波仔背对着镜头,周围是走来走去的工作人员。那画面在94年的玫瑰碗体育场我也曾见过。人群中你总要独自承受你的命运。
  
  而我却连听到《恋曲1990》都想哭。
  乌溜溜的黑眼珠和你的笑脸
  怎么也难忘记你容颜的转变
  轻飘飘的旧时光就这么溜走
  转头回去看看时已匆匆数年
  。。。。。。
  
  平和甚至温馨到有些老土的调子,阿郎载着波波在中环的夜色中见牙不见眼的笑着穿梭,一下子那些年少轻狂的日子全部倒回,又幸福又心酸,我想,时过境迁大概就是这个意思吧。
  黑漆漆的孤枕边是你的温柔
  醒来时的清晨里是我的哀愁
  或许明日太阳西下倦鸟已归时
  你将已经踏上旧时的归途
  人生难得再次寻觅相知的伴侣
  生命终究难舍蓝蓝的白云天
  
  很爱罗大佑,很爱80年代的香港和香港电影,很爱不那么年轻的青春和不那么伟大的壮烈。

 短评

我不知道如果没有这个令人潸然泪下的结尾,我会给这部电影打几分。但是它有,我也确实被感动了泪流满面,那就五星奉上。

7分钟前
  • 有心打扰
  • 力荐

杜琪峰34岁拍了这个电影,那一年,是1989。今晚,竟然,我是第一次看。不哭,几乎不可能。罗大佑的歌,是最催泪的子弹,最治愈的药。那个时候的香港电影,真是窝心温柔又浪漫逍遥,不怪那时的少年人,都看着港片学做男人。看这种电影的时候,你会觉得自己也是个好人。你以为这很容易,这种好转眼就没。

12分钟前
  • 老晃
  • 推荐

张艾嘉巅峰时期的好作品。内容俗套但看到最后你会发现自己早已热泪盈眶。

15分钟前
  • 半城风月
  • 力荐

不记得是多少年前,我看这个电影,大结局的时候,我哭得不成人形

17分钟前
  • 我来我征服
  • 力荐

黄坤玄的戏自然的很,恰到好处的好。剧作上写父子情,写浪子回头金不换都非常好,发哥的演绎真棒。

21分钟前
  • Morning
  • 力荐

当放荡不羁的飚车浪子变成了久经生活沧桑的父亲,周润发对底层小人物的深谙,使《阿郎的故事》既有着年少的青春爱情,也有着支离破碎后的亲情羁绊, 那令人意外的悲情渲染,诚然稍显突兀,但一曲浪子悲歌,确也道尽了世间的悲欢离合。

22分钟前
  • 梦里诗书
  • 力荐

当年感动得不行.

27分钟前
  • 能工巧匠沙门哥
  • 力荐

孤独的孩子,提着易碎的灯笼。

30分钟前
  • Enjoy_時光機。
  • 推荐

乌溜溜的黑眼珠和你的笑脸,怎么也难忘记你容颜的转变。ps,认识"你的样子"就是因为小学时候看过无数次阿郎的片尾曲,那个烈火中的眼神印象太深了。

33分钟前
  • 安蓝·怪伯爵𓆝𓆟𓆜
  • 力荐

周润发塑造的这个浪子让人看了就无法忘记,年轻时的放纵疯狂、出祸后的沉默和悔改都被表演的淋漓尽致。

38分钟前
  • 顾俏乜
  • 推荐

当《你的样子》渐渐响起,眼泪就止不住了~~

40分钟前
  • 战国客
  • 推荐

都说浪子回头金不换,那么能拿来交换的只能是性命。

41分钟前
  • 高冷的鸡蛋仔
  • 力荐

很俗套的故事,但是不讨厌

42分钟前
  • 大宸
  • 还行

这部电影,最后一幕,当发哥饰演的阿郎,骑着赛车最终冲向终点,却终究因伤势太重,事故爆炸的时候,在场所有人所表现的那种情感张力,那种悲伤,至今仍旧记忆犹新。或许杯具总让人难以忘怀。浪子回头金不换,但有时却付出了生命的代价

46分钟前
  • 吃瓜小能手
  • 力荐

话说徐娇真的是星爷按着黄坤玄的样子选出来的?

48分钟前
  • KeneL裤头
  • 推荐

最后5分钟的感动

53分钟前
  • 影志
  • 推荐

结尾比较突兀,人物都很理想化。就是浪子回头金不换嘛。还是值得一看的,不过一直觉得那个时候讲的故事都好简单

55分钟前
  • 九尾黑猫
  • 还行

爱上浪子就像爱上大海,汹涌澎湃一望无际痛快并存。

57分钟前
  • 一只虎耳草
  • 力荐

《恋曲1990》、《你的样子》……

1小时前
  • 想不明白
  • 力荐

张艾嘉坐在周润发的小摩托后面,《恋曲1990》响起来的时候,太让人泪飚了。

1小时前
  • mumudancing
  • 推荐

返回首页返回顶部

Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved